EWP 9-3-2 Douglas Elementary Equip and Blueprints 1958 28

Item

Title
EWP 9-3-2 Douglas Elementary Equip and Blueprints 1958 28
Tag
letter, January 22, 1958, Arthur E. Chapman, Supervisor, School Buildings, Virginia, C. M. Bussinger, Douglass Elementary School, project, contractual obligations, Commonwealth Reserve, State Board of Education, architectural firm, Bailey & Patton, fee distribution, drawings, specifications, supervision, low bid figure, construction costs, historical significance, bureaucratic processes, financial arrangements, public school construction, Virginia, mid-20th century, administrative frameworks, educational infrastructure development.
Place
Virginia, US
Identifier
1028506
Is Version Of
1028506_EWP_9-3-2_Douglas_Elementary_Equip_and_Blueprints_1958_28.pdf
Is Part Of
Deeds Schools and Construction
Date Created
2023-08-02
Format
.pdf
Number
94ed63274e6186a14bc54d611b26ace99e192aed0659dcccd58b11b5c3961288
Source
/Volumes/T7 Shield/EWP/Elements/EWP_Files/source/Ingest One/9 Deeds Schools and Construction/9-3 Construction Sales and Strategy/9-3-2 Colored Construction Files/9-3-2 Douglass Elementary/EWP_9-3-2_Douglas_Elementary_Equip_and_Blueprints_1958_28.pdf
Publisher
Digitized by: Edwin Washington Project
Rights
Loudoun County Public Schools
Language
English
Replaces
/Volumes/T7 Shield/EWP/Elements/EWP_Files/source/Ingest One/9 Deeds Schools and Construction/9-3 Construction Sales and Strategy/9-3-2 Colored Construction Files/9-3-2 Douglass Elementary/EWP_9-3-2_Douglas_Elementary_Equip_and_Blueprints_1958_28.pdf
extracted text
lll

RGIN

I4

STATE BOARD oF EDUCATION
RICHMONDT t6

Jar,raa.ry

22, L958

M:r. C. !t. Bussingor
I,eesburg

Vlrgi:nia

Dear Mr, Bussingerr

to yorrr letter of January 15 concorning our eonversation dealing wlth the eontraet for architectural senrices i:o conneetion
lrlth the Douglass Eleaentary School proJeet.
If you rri}l refer to the contract, third paragraph under Article IVt
and Article V, particularSy the soeond and tbird paragraphs, I be}leve you
' n"i-IL agree that the statenent and letter, eaeh dated Decerabor 2 frem Bailey
' & Pattonrs of,fiee, correctly reflect the terms of the eontraet as we understand. them. In oiher word,s, ?5 per6ent of the total fee for drawJ-ngs and
speclfieations applies to the low bid ftguro and the remaining 25 percent of
the fee for supervisLon applies to the cost of that w?rich tl:i1I actualJy be
ThLs

is in

reoponee

construeted.

I

a.n

returrrlng herer*i-ttr I{r. Baileyts letter with etatements and ttre

eontract.
Wlth

all

good

rrlshas,

I

a"n

t(uZu,]- S $ ,
ABC:pad
SIIG r

w'fr

rF

q

7,

* 'o

S:rpervisor of

r F?{ ;^ r l',i'.,*$

'FVTry:-**-^

sehooS-

Bnildings