-
Title
-
EWP 9-3-2 Douglas Elementary Equip and Blueprints 1958 34
-
Tag
-
Correspondence, Construction, Douglass Elementary School, Technical, Architects, Safety, Quality Control, Planning, Maintenance
-
Place
-
Virginia, US
-
Identifier
-
1028512
-
Is Version Of
-
1028512_EWP_9-3-2_Douglas_Elementary_Equip_and_Blueprints_1958_34.pdf
-
Is Part Of
-
Deeds Schools and Construction
-
Date Created
-
2023-08-02
-
Format
-
.pdf
-
Number
-
106015b32572af9b2c45a41a3d4550432efb720b528459b22584783818eee47e
-
Source
-
/Volumes/T7 Shield/EWP/Elements/EWP_Files/source/Ingest One/9 Deeds Schools and Construction/9-3 Construction Sales and Strategy/9-3-2 Colored Construction Files/9-3-2 Douglass Elementary/EWP_9-3-2_Douglas_Elementary_Equip_and_Blueprints_1958_34.pdf
-
Publisher
-
Digitized by: Edwin Washington Project
-
Rights
-
Loudoun County Public Schools
-
Language
-
English
-
Replaces
-
/Volumes/T7 Shield/EWP/Elements/EWP_Files/source/Ingest One/9 Deeds Schools and Construction/9-3 Construction Sales and Strategy/9-3-2 Colored Construction Files/9-3-2 Douglass Elementary/EWP_9-3-2_Douglas_Elementary_Equip_and_Blueprints_1958_34.pdf
-
extracted text
-
>1-1 f / .t t-l
/r=.k-.ra"/ ..1" +-.t. .-.*l
.
rk. ;,
January 31, L958
It.
&erl B. trLley
Ballcy & Petton
tlroB R. Sillnore $trset
Sllngton, Vtrglnta
Doat
k. Balleyt
f an rsturnlng the lcsterl-el that you subnltted to ttrls offlce rd-tJr
scvBrel cormcntg.
Lt
In regard to all electr!.aal rcrk, f ar$ore tbat tt rdLl met
aIL udenrrttera requlrenonts.
2.
I arn very and-oue to have aLL faueents of the t3pe R??12.
$rtc d.lL be necegasrJr or the ltttre eblldren rd,1t teave there
in the buildtng.
Ie dlseusead slth you the necesd.ty to have drlnking
fountetns thgt youLd be eecurely mctrored to the rall and
perferabf,s s folnteln that rDuld Dt be oupported only
by the ehlne pd of the fountatu sLnce theXr break ofi
.f,eucets runrd.ng a1l- around
3a
eo eaolly.
lr.
r^rm ext'nencly arudous to have a thorougtr ctreck on the capaclty
of ttre booEts heeter for the dfdnraching naehlne ln tbe
csfetcrle' ?hla tr rn iten tbat can cause us conalderable
d,ffLeufty rmlers thla oepectty la lerga enougf to take
qar€- of
lhe great denanda that rre nada on tba dlrtrrarhlrrg
urcbLne ln
relatlw ctrort'per.Lod,
Hlearc chcak trry orrfirlly tlre qu*l.ty of the safety equlpnent
e
5a
that r11I be on our bol.lcrt bcorruo f
trouble rhen rp get btler Lasrance,
& not rant 6
$tncereJ-y ]mffisr
C. l{. hrccinger
Dlvttton $pertsteadent
Gl{Brnlt
havs
I
EARL B. BAILEY, A.I.A.
CHAS. D. PATTON. A.I.A
MABYLAND!FFICE
MILLER BUTLDING
ROCKVILLE. MARYLAND
BAILEY AND PATTON
ARCHITECTS
t4OA N. FILLM'ORE STREET, ARLINGTON I, VIRGINIA
JAcKsoN 5-4314
January 27,
1958
Mr. C. M. Bussinger
Division Superintendent
Loudoun County
Leesburg, Virginia
Re: Douglass Elementary School
Dear Mr. Bussinger:
Regarding the type of fuel oi1 to be used at the Douglass
School, the matter was discussed at the tine the plans
were drawn and it was decided to design the heating plant
to use No. 5 oi1. The difference in cost in Arlington
between No. 5 and No. 6 oils is L.6 cents a gallon whereas
the difference here between No. 2 and No. 6 oils is 5.6
cents a ga11on. We never design a school for No. 2 ol1.
It is considered good engineering practice for schools
the size of Dougl-ass to use No. 5 oilr and schools the size
of a high school to use No. 6 oi1. The reason for this
is that the use of No.6 oi1 requires pre-heating equipment, controls and a larger tank. It costs about $5rOOO
more for the original installation.
It also takes a more
skilled pe rson to operate with No. 6 oi1 than wit h No. 5.
In one case, the Merrifield High School, we designed for
No. 6 oll" but because of the greater ease of operation,
they have always used No. 5. It was these considerations
which Led to the decision on No. 5 oi]- at the tirne the
building was planned.
If you have other questions on it,
into it further with you.
I wl11 be glad to
Very truly yours,
d,'*-t /'J'/g-,"'%
Earl B. Bailey
EBB: j lw
go
MARYLAND
.bFFICE
EARL B. BAILEY, A.T.A.
CHAS. D. PATTON. A.I.A
MTLLER BUILDING
ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND
BAILEY AND PATTON
ARCHITECTS
I4OA N. FILLM'ORE STREET, ARLINGTON I, VIRGINIA
JAcKsoN 5-4314
January 23,
1958
Mr. C. M. Bussinger
Divisl.on Superintendent
Loudoun County Schools
Leesburg, Virginia
Re: Douglass Elementary School
Dear Mr. Bussinger:
The plurnbing layout for the back wing of the Douglass
Elementary School has been revised to drain to the back,
and we come up with an invert elevation of 29?.O at the
back wa11 of the school. This will alloru us anple fa11
into a sewer at the rear of the school even if the public
seftrer is lald on top of the ground in the present stream
bed. The city engineers, however, will probably want to
lower the sewer a foot or so to get adequate cover over
it" with our fif1.
In suryeying for this public sewer, they should check the
grades all the way up from the existing sewer. As mentioned in your office, there appears to be a discrepancy
in the reference points used. The invert elevation at
the last existing manhole as sbown on the sketch in your
office was higher than the elevation of the ground in back
of the school, and it would have to be lower for the
sewer to work. The elevations on our drawings were taken
fron the survey nade by Robert K. Wilson.
--
Very truly yours,
B.AILEY &
PATTON
(d*.1 ,t,J-/J*;zf
Earl B. Bailey
EBB:jlw