EWP IMAG0140

Item

Title
EWP IMAG0140
Place
Virginia
Identifier
1043699
Is Version Of
1043699_EWP_IMAG0140.JPG
Is Part Of
Uncategorized
Date Created
2024-01-07
Format
Jpeg Image
Number
db31e2ecefd90cc90db6ba088d2491c0208caf179b946f12e62279517cff6d79
Source
/Volumes/T7 Shield/EWP/Elements/EWP_Files/Access Files/Upload temp/1043699_EWP_IMAG0140.JPG
Publisher
Digitized by Edwin Washingon Project
Rights
Loudoun County Public Schools
Language
English
extracted text
R 3 - =

these paragraphs hardly admits of argument. The allegation is that
the state, in paying for public services of the same kind and
character to ncn and women cqually qualified accordlng to standards
which thc stote itself prescribes, arbitrarily pays less to Hegrocs
than to white perscns. This is as clcar a discrininaticn on the

ground of race as could well be imagined and falls squarcly with-
in the inhibition of both the due process and. the cqual protection

clauses of the 14th Amendment. As was sold by Mr. Justice Harlan
in Gibson v, Mississippl 162 U,S., 565,591:

"Uncderlying all of those decislons 1s the principle that
the Constituticn of the United States, in its prescent form, forbls,
go far as civil and political rights are concerned, discrimination
by the General Government, or by the States, against any citizen
because of his racc. All citizens are cqual before the law. The
guarantees of life, liberty and property arec for all persons, within
the jurisdiction of thc United States, or of any State, without dis-
crinination against any becausc cf their racc. Thosec guarantces,
when theilr violaticn is properly presentcd in the rogular course
of procecedings, nust be enforced in the courts, both of the Naticn
and of the State, without refcrence to consilerations based upen
race,"

Dcaling with the precise question here involved, Judge
Chestnut, in Mills v, Lowndes 26 F. Supp. 792, 88%L, said:

"While the State nay freely sclcet its employes and


Item sets
Uncategorized