EWP IMAG0141
Item
-
Title
-
EWP IMAG0141
-
Place
-
Virginia
-
Identifier
-
1043700
-
Is Version Of
-
1043700_EWP_IMAG0141.JPG
-
Is Part Of
-
Uncategorized
-
Date Created
-
2024-01-07
-
Format
-
Jpeg Image
-
Number
-
5f013751d647138b56c0842e88b3703c71068489cce6b8893258693d5fd9092e
-
Source
-
/Volumes/T7 Shield/EWP/Elements/EWP_Files/Access Files/Upload temp/1043700_EWP_IMAG0141.JPG
-
Publisher
-
Digitized by Edwin Washingon Project
-
Rights
-
Loudoun County Public Schools
-
Language
-
English
-
extracted text
-
and of the State, without refcrence to consllieratlons dascec upcn
race."
Dcaling with the precise question here involved, Judge
Chestnut, in Mills v. Lowndes 26 F. Supp. 792, 801, said:
"Whilc the State nay freely sclcet its employes and
detcrnine their compensation it would, in ny opinion, be clearly i
unconstituticnal for o state to pass lcgislation which inmposed
discriminatory burdens on the celored race with respeect to their
qualifications for office or prescribe a rate of pay less than that
for other OlPSSOS solely on aucount cf race or color If therefone
the state lwws proscribc1 that colo;o' teacho s of vc;upl qualification
with white toachers shoul? reccive less conpensation cn account of
their color, such a law would cleerly be unccnstituticnal." |
In the later case of iills v. Board of Educatlion of Ann :
Arundel County 30 F .Supp. 245, Juilge Chestnut applied the principle
so stnted in holding that a discrinination as to pay of tcachers in
white and colorcd schools was violative of thoe constitutional pro-
vision, and that a colored teacher night invoke the power of the
court so toc ceclare. This we think is in sccord with a long line of
By S g i
sresiyent