EWP 1 1938 March 19 Jennie Dean

Item

Title
EWP 1 1938 March 19 Jennie Dean
EWP 1938 March 19 Jennie Dean
Tag
March 1938, letter, Abram Staples, Attorney General, Dr. Sidney Hall, Superintendent, Public Instruction, Richmond, Virginia, joint ownership, operation, Negro high school, school boards, Fauquier, Fairfax, Rappahannock, Prince William Counties, legal sections, Code, education, Negro youth, Literary loan, constructing, improving, school buildings, race relations, quality education, black students.
Place
Virginia
Identifier
1000661
Is Version Of
1000661_EWP_1938_March_19_Jennie_Dean.JPG
1000661_EWP_1938_March_19_Jennie_Dean.pdf
Is Part Of
Uncategorized
Date Created
2024-01-07
2024-07-22 19:26:25 +0000
Format
Jpeg Image
Pdf Document
Number
9970747055ea2690b0cef679a5047fbb7db459aad8e1e0ab719ccd7807fd2921
259e8c33f296ccaacad4e3fd7035c4ef14f64bb748a5db8be1cd2ff0d31d20a5
a568ea0e8a80000612967828d446a2b54f39c90747b75a551a39a91348811cc1
Source
/Volumes/T7 Shield/EWP/Elements/EWP_Files/Access Files/Upload temp/1000661_EWP_1938_March_19_Jennie_Dean.JPG
/Volumes/T7 Shield/EWP/Elements/EWP_Files/Access Files/jpg to pdf/need to upload or replc files to omeka/1000661_EWP_1938_March_19_Jennie_Dean.pdf
Publisher
Digitized by Edwin Washington Project
Digitized by Edwin Washingon Project
Rights
Loudoun County Public Schools
Language
English
Replaces
/Volumes/T7 Shield/EWP/Elements/EWP_Files/source/Ingest One/1 Civil Rights/LCPS_African_Educ_Folder/EWP_1938_March_19_Jennie_Dean.JPG
extracted text
Richmond, Virgimi=

March 19, 1938

Dr. Sidney B. Hall
Superintendent Publ
Richmond, Virginia

i¢ Instruction

Dear Dr. Hall:
This is in reply in which you request oy opinion
s hereinefter set out with reference to & proposod Negro

upon the gquestion
jam County. It seems that there is now being
and the present owners

to your letter of March 17,

sehool located in Prince Will
operated at Manassas & school under private ownership
ng %o convey same jointly to the school boards of
unties, the deed of comn-

of the property are willi _
Prince William, Pauquier, Faipfax and Rappahannock Co
ysion that the property shall at all times in the
you‘bh.

veyanse to con

future be used as a schoo
p school can pe owned

r not a Negro hig
counties.

is whether O
ds of these four

jon you ask
1 boar

{ntly by the schoo

It is my opinion that, reading section 6
it is pomissiblo for this to be done.
contemplates joint ownership and operation by two
extent, in my opinion, it should be construed as enlarging the provisions of
~ section 670 of the Code which applies %o only two counties.

\Yo\u' gecond question is whether OT not the condition proposed
the deed requiring & con® ¢ the property for the edu
youth would be ¢riction oTr objection %o the title as %o
meking of 2 Literary these counties for the purpose of cons

those already jocated on the property.

puildings or improving
It is my opinion that this provision would not be objactionablo
point of & Literary loan.

The first que st
and operated jo
67 of the Code along with section 670,
Seetion 667 was reenacted in 1936 and

or more counties,

to be jnserted in
cation of Negro
preclude the
+ructing new

from the stand-

Sincerely yours,

ABRAM P. STAPLES

(Signed)
Attorney General

APS:NSE R

Contribute

A template with fields is required to edit this resource. Ask the administrator for more information.