EWP 1 1939 Daily (3)

Title

EWP 1939 Daily (3)

Tag

houses, advertisement, partition wall, Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland, trustee's sale, Circuit Court, estate settlement, Charles C. Wacker

Place

Virginia

Identifier

1000664

Is Version Of

1000664_EWP_1939_Daily_(3).JPG

1000664_EWP_1939_Daily_(3).pdf

Is Part Of

Uncategorized

Date Created

2024-01-07

2024-07-22 19:26:27 +0000

Format

Jpeg Image

Pdf Document

Number

366cf445ad6eb93855f71a768d60f50828a70e5ff40cdaeaad7b3e7d107b777f

2678ea8aeea4241c5af2c90754513dbcb2d15087bf3c9ec1a138c0784a0481ad

8db105bffc9c23237b5a12e862078f1279d6de034072af7e785eb7e39dac70f3

Source

/Volumes/T7 Shield/EWP/Elements/EWP_Files/Access Files/Upload temp/1000664_EWP_1939_Daily_(3).JPG

/Volumes/T7 Shield/EWP/Elements/EWP_Files/Access Files/jpg to pdf/need to upload or replc files to omeka/1000664_EWP_1939_Daily_(3).pdf

Publisher

Digitized by Edwin Washington Project

Digitized by Edwin Washingon Project

Rights

Loudoun County Public Schools

Language

English

Replaces

/Volumes/T7 Shield/EWP/Elements/EWP_Files/source/Ingest One/1 Civil Rights/LCPS_African_Educ_Folder/EWP_1939_Daily_(3).JPG

extracted text

“F tha o, caeiTrecord aga defendant | 1918 to $600; 10 loetl KO Ul L Lo i rom $300 to $4UU 5 410 = o N CTYEE TIOU ILISCAT LU UIE MEAUC V8.1 Sl Ra 0 T ity °0 S0 dp el Guissp Wige e (T | P 1 5
> j $600; 3 ing from $300 to $aUU; school | 1 A s s December, 1939, to show cause 1f any ue
MMmmwm.mOo:% ty Board of Equcation. by % mmu% . qnd in 1939, (on @ %:ﬂwﬁw a wﬁoﬂ.gaﬁ in favor of wﬂmw_owmgm Maryland, but exists in many Southern M%»m mmm,:Mww_mwawwmmwmwwﬁ“% mwﬁ%oﬁm #nd 1y s have, cég mwma relief prayed for
resent suit the plainti R T to professional q - i le for States.® . £ : should not be granted.
ntiff has sue pasis as to D rs in the scale es. that the bus transportation of pupils to the
MWM%MMQSH@ Board ang its wﬁ@mﬁ:ﬁm mmﬁﬁmﬁ and experience) to muwwm%_ and, Mmmmwmm,:um difference in ?Mww %Wwwﬁo sNor has Anne Arundel County been m.wmo.o~, mwm. busses E..Ei:ww and H@ﬁﬁm sm X - nﬁ\. CONWELL SMITH.
) a e fice . eoree C y oo al . % B g " _| different times, requires e principals of | True Copy—Test:
one. Under the practice re- if the teacher held an academiC GESI®S (4, 1 school teacher %E«%w%z& be-| unmindful of or indifferent to its Drob-| (hoce schools to have approximately 1% o CHAS. R. WHITEFORD,
h di :M. As previously noted, it does not| hours additional attendance per day at|p714921.98 wasi Clerk.

cently established p i the minimum
i y the new federal 50. By comparison There is also a salary i chool
to $1,450 There is d pigh scho lilmit the pay of its teachers either|school over and above the time required for |77

rules of eivil proy . rs of sim-
cedure the defendants| for colored elementary teachers <l tw elementary Stat ]
have fil ; ants | for colore heir | tWVeen el g py the Staté| 2 ; sizse, Mills. It appears, however, that what is
od o hirdparty complaints| ilar rating las been much Hmmmw nﬂ not | teachers in colored schools ot siocessary LVEIIELREEGI0ted SORLE SRaIE of the| oquired in this respect is additional time William S. Wilson, Jr., Solicitor,
-t minimum statute. It is B State statutes. In January, 1938, the|from the teachers of the school to receive 1001-2 Court Square Building.

against the State Board of Education| salaries have been fixed by 8

. e high | *I% 3 5 i ;
and the County Commissioners of Anne|on a yearly but monthly basis, and for ¥s Wtire’ rumther details of he. 0-5 1 w,wa passed a resolution expressing|and discharge pupils rather than from the | I[N THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALTI-
SH

t the 4 0
bm&? bu s TR o i principal alone. The teachers receive no MORE CITY — (B—b511—1939) — Marion
pathy with the proposition that the| ;qgitional * compensation for their extra | Winitred A. WES:A vs. William Kendall.

Arundel Count g ¢ vo. £ seven k 1o res.
1y as third party defen- £ the time heretofore, tor 1 hool schedules in this 1€ i
n most of the 1| school sc ored prin E 2 i
MNBM@ atd the latter have moved to months of the year. In 1918 the min“| .o of Frank E. Butler; 2 QOWOH at An-|salaries of white and colored teachers | time which seems to be substantially merely ORDER OF PUBLICATION
1SINISS these third party complaints ras §280 per year, increased In| . o " . e Bates High Sch tion. | should be equalized by State law, andfan incident of their general duties. 3 e :
3 .[mum w 2 1922 to $595; p ; r illustra ‘| edBssing regret that no immediate (5) See “Special Problems of Negro Edu- | . The object of this bill is to procure a
3 Mor- | * cation,” by Doxey A. Wilkerson, Staff|decree of divorce a vinculo matrimonii by

napolis may be taken fo

The complaint : &
in this case calls at-|1920 to $445 per year; in
egree £10 action could be taken by the Board to-| Study No. 12, prepared for the Advisory |the plaintiff, Marion Winifred A. Kendall,

tention to the M. i e in
: aryland statute which in 1939, (by reason of increas He received an A.B. d con-
provides a minimy 3 St ' of the school year) to i 50 and has beer ward that result in view of the county’s | Committee of Hducation i 1 dall
4 : ion ! y , published by the |from the defendant, William Kendall.
m scale or salaries|the duration of th gan College 1n s . Government Printing Office, Washington,| The bill recites the marriage of the par-

for white t ime, | & eacher in orj Y Y R B : :
eachers At the present. time, tinuously employed as & t 1 in Anne finances, but indicating an intention to 1939, pages 8, 14, 22, 24, ties in Blkton, Maryland, on January 1,

fessio < 5, 8raduated to pro-1$765 per year : & L g ;
ummm::ﬁ qualificationg and years of ex-|{therefore, the respective minima are principal of a 883@ schoo. Jears. He| soon make some increase in the rate of (6) See Special Problems of Negro Wdu- | 1935, by a religious ceremony, the residence
e, and a separate statute provid-| $1,250 mom white teachers and $765 for ‘Arundel County for EEWSS_% of $1,600 pay for the colored teachers. For the ozm%owwcw %mwm%a.»m. é%mﬂmop mmum mqmﬁ% mh the plaintiff in &mwﬁmmm for »Bmwm ‘wrmu

St $ I'0- . 1 salar ) ¢ y «ti g 5 5 f . s e or visory Committee | two years prior to the ng of the bill;

with comparable Dro-{ o= . i o< an annual sal sdllastic year 1939-40 it has increased | ;> pav Rtion, Government Drinting Office,| that wo enildren —vere born o the parties

ing a low ini i $
g wer minimum for teachers in colored teachers, arable white | 5 ’ ;
its budget for colored teachers’ salaries | Washington, 1939; also Progress and Prob-|as a result of the marriage; that without

o.&%.m&mgo&m. . .o:oo .
.. .w,m:mm:mém?mwmz . E_Eamgzmmamwug.>€E$Euﬁc&o§85u ..:E
W Sai.nm: application only white »m.m%-“.mm%mm:wwmmuam contends that the stat high mmww& would receive 2 s from $66,000 to $74,000, which is a Wﬂm%oﬂ zﬁwgfwww mmummwpc& Bh ki | e e (e ClGTRE A e
olored toaployed in white schools and |utes are unconstitutionally discrimini ,¢go 6o that in|Iuch larger proportionate increase for ion, ol don Bt; N IML, Wasttighon D.| clei e e e T e a8
Mm%_.m% mﬂmwmwws.m in colored schools E:_Tcwm w: their face and should be %&m T also find from the mﬁuwﬂomﬁm 43 | colored teachers than for white teach-|C. w:m? o o e BT mwmw wamw Mw_ﬂwuwm ww H.wwwﬁmw e u»zn
atter are paid less in L walid. On the other han Arnndel County the .| ers, the increase for the latter being|Laws for Teachers, published by the same|since that date; that there is no reasonable
Arundel ¢ 3 €ss 1n Anne| generally invalid. tat. [fANNe Arunde wd teachers; . . - Association January, 1937. Hond 00 Vasoneil! W e idet t
solely on acopns; cham, White teachers it is pointed ot n defence oF KL S5 fhito teachers and 8% (-*vceives so) {26k S GO0 0 OB, 0413000, o T e
The plaintifr of their race or color. | utes that they constitute 7 hile the jjut no one colored 3%28 teacher of ) it voluntarily increased by : en LEGAL NOTICES. known address was Washington, D. C.
tutes an contends that this consti-| magzimum, salaries, and that, while much salary as eny Wio xperience. per cent. the salaries of colored school R Tadedls It is hereby ordered by the Circuit Court
Hon éEowcmogmnmscgﬁ discrimina- | minimum for white teachers 18 Eﬁa imilar qualifications and € the case is teachers for the remaining months of . on. mm Baltimore City, this 6th day of Novem-
s Is prohibited by the equal! than the minimum for teachers in €O If myq erycial question I 7= sigeren. | the scholastic year 1938-89. That per-| py1§ 18 TO GIVE NOTICE, That the sub- | po3 %ww‘mmwu%m:ﬁu% Ew_ﬁm_n. e wm.ouoﬁwm
&Emm on clause of Section 1 of thel ored schools, the statutes affecting the [Ty fo o the very mgcmnmsn&és#m and | centage increase was not continued for| scriber has obtained from the Orphans’| ijey to he o ,momsm %nww e e
a0 EM‘UQBEA to the Federal Consti-| Iatter do not expressly apply to colored | 11" ot wveen the salaries Of Arundel | the current year; but in October of this Wﬂmm:ow wwﬂwawmﬂmwwmﬂnwnm%ammom adminis- | paper published in Baltimore City once a
. he prayer for specific relief| teacher ueh but only to all teachers colored teachers in »P.B:o. ac-| year the Board proposed to a represen- © " % JACOB ECK week for four successive weeks before the
S that “the ( i | teachers as s hite or :epimination on 3 i £ ; 7th day of December, 1939, give notice to
. \ ourt issue a permanent|j lored schools whether white County is due to discriml d as & tative delegation of county colored|late of said city, deceased. All persons |ty ahsent defendant Willlam Kendall, of
mﬁmﬂoinwb Mowgmu restraining and o:-ﬁmwawm%wm: is also to be noted, a8 Was| oo b e or coloT HQWHW it is.|School teachers that it would for the wwﬁww %H.Mwﬂ wmmwwwm;wwﬁ:% Sasie mﬂmm.m the object and substance of this suit and
'om wzmw@m, ﬁ,.msmm:.ﬁ S and each of gmbﬁ@&i&. out in the opinion in the f0I" |10t from the testimony py counsel sudigeding scholastic year and for each |y, "voychers thereof legally authenticated, meﬂ%m% mwm ﬁm it ﬂu@%gamn%u _ww“m ,Qo,_mm.w
;'8 a1y distinction solely onjme that the County is the unit | o me effort has been made the dif-|year thercafter increase their salaries|to the subscriber on or before the 16th |s5,q day of Db AR o PR OTE e
le grounds of race or color ; Nl e ‘on in the State; that defendants to justity < | by an additional ten per cent. until they | day of May, 1940; they may otherwise, by | premises and abide by and perfo B
[ salaries i Lh0r 3 yedlising | for public edusats i for ot v ther grounds.| v i o law. bo excluded from all benefit of said |3 Sranoy RO aey P10 WDe T ORI
sk mnmcma_ White and colored|the County Boards of mmzoﬁ::pn w_wwa ference in salaries on %H recently the approximated the State EEEM_ME MS. e A e d b0 SRIG eatts decree as may be passed herein.
prin discretion as to the AP i unti . | whita teachers. it heing estimated that|ave peaposted to, mato trmpeaset 0 \ X W._ CONWERLL. SMIT
g Thus it is said that what longer .1 m ¢l GV R ﬁ.w %wﬁaww:m this Hm.?o:%ww om True Copy—Test: MRy

: cipals employed for|f ity for i 7 ] y timated tf ;
e public schoolg P ull authority i heir teach- ; e L 20 1r would require four or five years to[Given un
unty, and from umwmc Wﬂ:m Arundel | actual amount %wmmwwwoﬁw‘ orAl-s: mmwo&wmamw&www mﬁﬁmc in the %%Mommm Nk Mgkt such equalization, on the zb%ﬁ%% 1939. bwwww.s. Hmowm %Eﬁsq CHAS. R. WHITBFORD,
£ or any other coloreq o&w@%»ﬂm o e Jﬁ%@ in co-operation With | g 016 and it is also sald t ¢ than | condition that the present suit be with- i lussrateis, ¢ & 8.1 n7,14,21,28 Clerk.
incipal employed by them g 1 sl =l at m EBmmmmo:E,m of the Coun- o&oam&.ﬂmmgﬁ.m are less efficient sults | drawn; but this proposition was de- Kenney & Kaiser, Attorneys, O
y than they pay any white w mwm sal- ﬂ.:m County oH to pay higher salaries bl iite 1hachees cmomsmm.gm N.M col. | clined by the plaintiff whose action in 16 St. Paul Street. RTY SALES.
incipal mHEEo%mQ by them waommmmﬂm M%MHHHWWM@MHWNMfE fixed by law; and| e vominations in the s&MM_ m%ocb%. the matter had the support of all the em.wm_uwm ﬂmm@ww\%@wﬂm@m w,wwﬂ %wmswﬁw.. TRUSTEE'S SALE OF

equivalent position in 1 18 i v ine of the twenty-three hools in Anne ATun s30 | colored teachers of the county. But|cesrt of Baltimore City letters of adminis- 1504 NORTH GAY STREET

Ol R DU i “fact 1c UAlP N rked by qugide these financial considerations cannot|tration on the estate ww

: Baltimore | s are Ma
counties of the State, and T¢| \when the papers

mwmg.mgmw complaint “ o ! salaries to white |0 tia] “educators, ShO
seeks a declaratory

s i LUDWIG W. KAISER, o =
5 ay 6qild upils | control the supreme law of the land as PR : By decree of the Circuit Court No. 2 of
m“wuw QHM %% Mom%nwmnm of equal Profes|iii)y jower average for oowow.wgowcwmm- expressed in the 14th Amendment, and WMW;MH Mw_wwwmrpwwwmmﬁmmwmm%@ a%ww%%mﬁwww wmmrsmg S -G hies mnderste e glintstog,
4 CO0xC But the implementing Acts of Congress|Lereby warned to exhibil the same, with |jses mm_ at public auction, on the prem-

100ls of Anne Arg
amendment to th e ool By

- plaintiff algo

ree (under 28 U. §, ¢ i d experience. It . i 118
g “° V. n. G, 8. 400) “that|sional lifications and e 1 than for white puplls. it is to be ) 3
s Court aqd 3 sional quall at in prac-| . jons 1 i ere. the vouchers thereof legally authenticated, = ]
judge and declare that|is clear enough, therefore, that i D¢ oy to these contentloBl —yag now swmﬁw: E_wm.n cm %awuoﬁsmgwﬁ%mmim to| 0 the subscriher on ot before the 16th THURSDAY, DECEMBER 7, 1939
€ objections by the / day of May, 1940; they may otherwise, by AT 4:00 O'CLOCK P. M,

endents’ policy co : of them- 1
; mplained of here-| i lieation the statutes noted that the school ! d colored
in the res S . - | tical applicatio: . : hite AN v | i\ inti : i
) am respects it ig maintained and|selves do not necessarily require actual been made equal for Whi < de in exami- the .zu:% m.mw% by the plaintiff were|law. be excluded from all benefit of said | AL,1, THAT LOT in Baltimore, Maryland,
rced pursuant to State statutes as|discrimination i practice betweel | ¢.nools; and the lower gr 4 pupils is considered in the former case. Thus|estate. All persons _Mnm.mcﬁmm to said estate | on the northwest side of Gay Street at the
S as| discrimina colored D unds | it is argued that the plaintiff is not|2are requested to Ew mm_EEmeww:cm%Embm center of the partition wall between the
gro Given under my hand this 1 ay Ol lhouse on this lot and the house adjoining

| as in the res ir 8 t : i
pects it is maintained | whi lored teachers on accoullinationg attained by
| enforced in th aintained | white and color E t ig, how- g % n other titled t Tai D o
i € absence of con-|only of thei or color? It 1s, readily explainable 0 lored | €ntitled to complain because he 1S a|November, 1939. i i i
2 eir race J . of €O 2 e Rt on the southwest side, being at the dis-
ling statutes, violateg ? that the statutes dipap the alleged E%ﬁan@& the de-|Dublic employe; in the former opinion o JOSEPH ?%%mﬁf tance of 38 feet 3 inches northeasterly from
the view was taken that he has a suf-|n1421,28,do Strator. | the corner formed by the intersection of
—_—————————— | the northwest side of Gay St. with the

the due pro-|ever, equally clear :
pro-jever, equally €15 1 ds to make sueh | toacherss The contentions

' and equal protection ¢] n-
. Amend clauses of the | permit the County L 7 S ‘ cem really ur e , e :
ment of the Constitution of diserimination, and there is ample eVi-(fandants in this respect S ficient status as a qualified school ol Il bobth mide nr lar i ot

m
United States; and Seoti ties of : whole proplem 1 i ched b B e t

,. 3 ections . : ost of the counties 0tiqpstantial when the o f the | teacher by profession and occupation thence northwesterly along the center of
f Title 8 of the Uniteqd mnwﬂwwﬂoww@ mmarm%wﬁn HMBMMﬁ&Bm Anne Arundel| vjowed historically in the light o to have the question determined. Again | Niles, Barton, Morrow & Yost, Attorneys, |said partition wall u.mm mmmnm@ inches, omn._onm

: ; gl state Drac-( s o : Balti Life Buildi ¢ !
Drecise unders i ial difference general § in | it is argued th injunction should altimore Life Building. or less, to the end thereof; thence still
| statutory manWMMHS%W v ﬁ;ﬁuﬁm uﬁmm.%. County) a very mﬂwwwwmﬁm dﬁwwmg and wwﬂwwﬁﬂﬂwﬁuwwwwﬂmvummﬂw MBQ ﬁmnnﬂac_maq in| it gued that an inj THIS IS TO GIVE NOTICH, That the sub- | northwesterly continuing the same direc-
: Pbublic edu-|between the pay SC :

h 1 ; A not be granted because there is an ade-| ™ o5 5 Yo "obtained from the Orphans’|tion 36 feet 7 inches, more or less, to the
n is essential to a cong has always existel|the Jight of the

ical appli- ;
: i al practicd in | quate remedy at law by mandamus in | Balti City let f adminis- | southeast side of lley 10 feet wide;

. idered opin-| colore achers actu statutes in $ 1| Court of Baltimore City letters of adminis of an alley eet wide;

on the question bresented by the| Tt S 1 that the annual aver|eation of the Maryland indeed any | the State Court. This also was dis-|tration on the estate M Mwm@unmw E.E_mwm%% along the southeast
lings and testi : 3 hus it is show: lored teacl- del County. And cussed in the former case, but in a some- CHARLES C. WATKER, of said alley 11 feet 9 inches, more or
statut SUmony in thig case.|age salary for whote PHESOS i “fact would seem : o s late of said city, deceased. All pensons |less, to the division between the closet on
statutory provisions were discussed in el tary schools in the Mary-| controversy over the s nony, of the s.&,mﬁ different connection. The objec-|having claims against said deceased are|this lot and the one adjoining on the
ers in elemen n tions to an injunction which were there| hereby warned to exhibit the same, with |northeast; thence southeasterly along said

ngth in the former jod of 192T to nded by the

- 5 r case, 26 F. S.|land Counties for the DETIO to be ende 4 : : i the vouchers thereof le : ivisi i .
. : > e g gally authenticated, | division 3 feet 7 inches, more or less;

(to which reference of nearly two to on¢|gefendant, Fox, who 18 rundel County held valid, do not exist here; and Title to the subseriber on or before the 9th day |thence southwesterly along the southeast

is hereby 1939 is i ratio S 3 /
09 1y taiie te teachers. In 192l Education in Anne 8, s. 43 of the United States Code ex-|,f ‘May, 1940; they may otherwise, by |side of said closet 1 foot to a division
fence; thence southeasterly along said

) and need not i
TN & now be repeated. | in f: f the whl j i

opinion in the for BER Bitor o6a S res were $881 forland an executive officer g Me- | Pressly authorizes an injunction as a|law, be excluded from all benefit of said
on March 1, 1939 H,MJMH. case ﬂmm_zﬁ‘ comparative wm%mwm tor colored; i|gchool Board, and that of Eﬁmm the | possibly appropriate remedy in this|estate. All persons indebted to said estate |fence 4 feet 114 inches to the westernmost
nt legislati ] € omly sub-| white teachers an $1,19 ial secretdly s &casds are requested to make immediate payment. | corner of the brick dwelling adjoining on
on upon the subject is figures were 31,19 Neely, the financ cmgnnmm_q ad- ) - y Given under my hand this 6th day of |the northeast; thence northeasterly 414
The County Board of Education also November, 1939. ANNA ryébowm? W.Ewam 8. _mrm _,omﬁﬁ of the partition wallk
N - o e o e TR s 2829 a1l "™ 14 ©O1 B S ace 2 vl b bl we: otftvovoon Fh o adat e g b cwan e AR BBl LR der®! ABR

\ ive
aryland Act of 1930 o 0Iect 1811930 the ﬁ@mmomwp 1031, $1,314 and $848 Board, both of whom SUD>E - Tn the

Item